RESULTS DEPEND UPON FACTS OF EACH CASE; SIMILAR CASE RESULTS NOT GUARANTEED
- PARENTS BEWARE: INFANT SEATS FAIL IN SIDE-IMPACT CRASHES
- TO PERSONAL-INJURY VICTIMS AND PAIN-SUFFERERS -- OVER-THE-COUNTER PAINKILLERS CAN BE HARMFUL
- WHY ARE THERE NO MEDICATION ERRORS IN VIRGINIA WHEN MEDICATION ERRORS KILL OR INJURE 1.5 MILLION AMERICANS EVERY YEAR?
- PEDESTRIAN AND MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS ACCOUNT IN PART FOR HIGHEST TRAFFIC DEATH TOLL SINCE 1990
- VIRGINIA JURIES SHOULD CONSIDER THE FACTS OF THE CASE AND NOT FALSE TALKING POINTS OF THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY
- NO, VIRGINIA, YOUR PERSONAL-INJURY AWARDS ARE NOT EXCESSIVE; YOU ARE NOT A "JUDICIAL HELLHOLE"
- DOES SUDDEN EMERGENCY STILL EXIST IN VIRGINIA? DID THE VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT DEAL A BODY BLOW OR LET THE GUILLOTINE FALL?
- YES, EVEN IN VIRGINIA -- GOOD SETTLEMENTS OF PERSONAL-INJURY CASES -- A PROVOCATIVE PRIMER
- GERRY SPENCE'S FAMOUS FINAL PLEA IN CLOSING ARGUMENT
- MARLO BEATS-UP ALLSTATE IN VIRGINIA TRIAL -- $0 OFFER; $25,000 COVERAGE; $123,000 RECOVERY
- BRINGING BACK THE BRAIN-INJURED -- NATIONAL BOOK AWARD WINNER
- TR SPEAKS TO THE TRIAL LAWYER FACING BATTLE OR DEFEAT
- TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY -- SOBERING STATISTICS, MAJESTIC STRUGGLES
- TRIAL LAWYER -- DO YOU FOLLOW THE SAME DISCOVERY PLAN IN EVERY CASE, OR DO YOU CEREBRATE AND CELEBRATE?
- $1.8 MILLION BRAIN-INJURY VERDICT VS. EMPLOYER REINSTATED BY VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT
- VIRGINIA STUDY: BRAIN INJURY AND DEATH RISKS LOWERED WITH SIDE AIRBAGS
